Archive for Han Solo

Review: Star Wars The Force Awakens

Posted in Film with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on January 17, 2016 by Tom Austin-Morgan

Star Wars The Force Awakens

The long and eagerly awaited seventh episode of the Star Wars saga picks up around 30 years after the events of Return of the Jedi, so all the original cast didn’t have to go through any post-production de-aging that made people in The Hobbit look so strange. So that’s one good thing… among many more good things.

JJ Abrams was on a hiding to nothing directing the first Star Wars film since the almost universally panned prequels. Also, Disney needed to make a decent return on the $4billion investment it made buying the franchise from George Lucas.

The idea seems to be: The best way to make a ton of money from this film is to give the fans what they want. What the fans have been clamouring for since it looked like episode seven was on the cards was another film like the original films. And that’s exactly what they’ve got.

The film hits almost every beat from A New Hope; starts with a shot of a Start Destroyer floating across the screen; a droid is given instructions to keep safe; a masked bad guy clad in black; an orphan on a desert planet; an up-himself general; a grand master hologram; a Yoda-style alien figure; a kidnapped central female character; a Death Star/ice planet (I know this is Empire Strikes Back) for the main Jedi to sneak round; there are more, but you get the gist.

Luckily for Abrams, he decided to go mainly with physical settings and stunts, for the most part. So, automatically it looks like it belongs to the same universe as the original films. I don’t even think the amount of references is problematic, though there were slightly too many. The bits that really stood out and don’t work are the fully-CG monsters or characters. For example, the big ball-monsters on Han Solo’s freighter and Grand Master Snoke.

In fact, until it was made obvious that Snoke (Andy Serkis) is a hologram it made me angry that they had some weird giant that looks like a cross between Gollum and the leader of the orcs from The Hobbit. I still can’t get over the look of Snoke and can’t see why he couldn’t have been in prosthetics that were augmented by CG.

The new cast was great, John Boyega’s character, Finn could have had a more interesting arc from stormtrooper to resistance member, but was so charismatic it didn’t really matter. Daisy Ridley’s Rey is a great, strong lead female character, though how she progressed so quickly is a little beyond me compared to those who have gone before her. Adam Driver as Kylo Ren was a strange one, his entrance was brilliant, but over the course of the film he became more annoying and weaker. Also, he probably should have kept his helmet on.

The best of the new cast, by far, apart from BB-8, was Poe Dameron, played by Oscar Issacs who is on a really strong role at the moment. He was massively underutilised, but it leaves you wanting to know more about him. He almost seems too good.

Some of the original cast were back, can’t say much about Mark Hamill, Carrie Fisher has been through some really tough times since the 70s and I’m afraid it shows. It was a bit sad. R2-D2 and C3PO are back, but not quite as you might remember them, though C3PO has one of the funniest moments in the movie. Chewbacca gets a much bigger role in this film, but the greatest turn comes from Harrison Ford as Han Solo, he looks like he was having such a great time, though that’s probably because he knows there’s an end to his contract any he can go and be Indiana Jones again, history repeats itself!

I wasn’t at all bowled over by this film because, for each throwback to the original films it took away the option to create something new, but I think the balance was just about right. It was just a bit of a shame that the plot was so predictable as it stuck so rigidly to the skeleton of A New Hope. Compared to the prequels it’s a breath of fresh air and is exactly what it needs to be and the further away I get from the film the more forgiving I am of it.


I’ve avoided major spoilers until this last section, it’s very hard to know exactly what’s a spoiler and what’s not, which is why I’ve left it this late to post. But I may drop a spoiler in here now, because I need to call out the biggest gripe I have with the film: The treatment of Han Solo in this film.

At the end of Return of the Jedi he has gone through a change from being a rogue who is just out for himself to a caring person who has found a niche and people who care about him and vice versa. Between the sixth and seventh movies he and Leia have had a child (at least one) who has been trained in the Jedi arts by Luke, but turns against him. So, he’s lost his child, lost Leia and has gone back to smuggling, which he still sucks at. So much so that he loses the Millennium Falcon.

Meeting Rey and Finn at the beginning of the film reunites him with all these elements, apart from his son, things are starting to look up, but no. He is then killed by his emo son and thrown into an abyss. The abyss is then blown up, leaving absolutely no doubt that’s he coming back or could be saved. The upcoming Han Solo origin story will be tinged with sadness too as we all know his eventual fate.

 In fact, that there’s even still a dark side and empire that is so powerful casts a pall over the achievements of the first three films. It renders all the rebel victories completely pointless as it’s all just repeating itself, seemingly straight away.  Even the droid are sad! R2-D2 is so depressed that Luke ran away without it that it shut itself down and now lives under a duty tarp, leaving C3PO’s second line in the whole film – and one of its few – to be “I do miss him so.” This is not what I wanted from this film, it was supposed to be a bit more of a celebration.

It’s not a bad film, and I did enjoy it, I just think that the back story that we didn’t get to see is so sad. In a way, I’m glad we didn’t get to see it. The fans would have would have torn Disney’s castle down.

There’s way more to this, and the best thing you can do is to go listen to my podcast to get the full story.

Advertisements

Review: The Lego Movie

Posted in Film with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on February 9, 2014 by Tom Austin-Morgan

the-lego-movie

Lego is one of the most successful brands in the world, starting life in the shed of Danish carpenter, Ole Kirk Christiansen – who set up the company in 1949. The company has expanded ever since, spilling out into theme parks, lucrative movie tie-ins, computer games and now a full-length feature film.

The plot focusses on Emmet, a regular construction worker who builds things in a team and always follows the instructions until, one day, he stumbles upon a group of super-builders who are fighting against the tyranny of Lord Business, who controls the Lego world with instructions that the populace follow in complete obedience.

This is the thrust of the movie; don’t be constrained by the instructions, use your imagination and you can create what you want. Which is, kind of, the point of Lego. And, why wouldn’t a Lego movie be about anything else? Well, for a start, it could have been about anything. Literally. But instead, this is a very formulaic, paint-by-numbers, nuts-and-bolts film that is pretty devoid of any real soul.

Understandably, the calls of “but it’s a kids film” will be flung my way, but it could have been made a much more inspirational story and have a slightly more likable character at the centre of the action. Emmet, voiced by Chris Pratt, is fine and lovable when he’s playing by the rules, unaware of the control asserted on his world by Will Ferrell’s Lord Business. Emmet is upbeat and fun-loving, but when he is recruited, wrongly, but the master builders, led by Vitrvius (Morgan Freeman)among assorted heroes such as Batman (Will Arnett) and love interest, Wyldstyle (Elizabeth Banks), Emmet turns overly reluctant and a little whiny. This is overcome by the end of the film, but doesn’t detract from his character’s personality in general.

The Lego computer games are peppered with sly bits of humour and there are moments in this film that elicits laughter, but not enough to raise it into the big leagues of Pixar or even DreamWorks.  The funniest moment for me involved the Millennium Falcon from Star Wars, involving cameos from Anthony Daniels as C3PO and Billy Dee Williams as Lando, but not Harrison Ford as Han Solo.

I think, in the end, this film is missing something that the games have nailed. It’s difficult to say what it is, but perhaps it’s because the games are based on an existing script and story line? Whatever the reason, The Lego Movies is fun which you watch it, but not engaging or funny enough.